From: marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:13:02 -0200 > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:53:48PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:42:35 +0800 >> >> > Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that is >> > looked up by __sctp_lookup_association(), and didn't return it back. But in >> > sctp_rcv, it is used to initialize chunk->transport. So when hitting this, >> > even if it found the transport, it was still initializing chunk->transport >> > with null instead. >> > >> > This patch is to return the transport back through transport pointer >> > that is from __sctp_rcv_lookup_harder(). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> So do I apply this to 'net'? If so I'd like to see explicit ACKs. >> >> Thanks. > > No. Xin reposted the patchset with this patch updated instead, so please > ignore this one. Thanks. > > Patchset named: [PATCHv2 net 0/3] sctp: a bunch of fixes by holding transport I got this now, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
