On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:42:35AM +0800, Xin Long wrote: >> Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that is >> looked up by __sctp_lookup_association(), and didn't return it back. But in >> sctp_rcv, it is used to initialize chunk->transport. So when hitting this, >> even if it found the transport, it was still initializing chunk->transport >> with null instead. >> >> This patch is to return the transport back through transport pointer >> that is from __sctp_rcv_lookup_harder(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > Patch looks good now but you have to either repost the entire series > altogether, or repost the series to remove this patch from it. Ah, sorry, will repost the entire series altogether. > > Marcelo > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
