Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 9/28/16 5:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Jia He <hejianet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:22:21 +0800

v5:
- order local variables from longest to shortest line
I still see many cases where this problem still exists.  Please
do not resubmit this patch series until you fix all of them.

Patch #2:

-static int snmp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
+static int snmp_seq_show_ipstats(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
  {
  	int i;
+	u64 buff64[IPSTATS_MIB_MAX];
  	struct net *net = seq->private;

The order should be "net" then "buff64" then "i".
Sorry for my bad eyesight and quick hand :(
B.R.
Jia

+static int snmp_seq_show_tcp_udp(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct net *net = seq->private;
+	unsigned long buff[TCPUDP_MIB_MAX];

The order should be "buff", "net", then "i".

Patch #3:

@@ -192,13 +197,19 @@ static void snmp6_seq_show_item(struct seq_file *seq, void __percpu *pcpumib,
  				const struct snmp_mib *itemlist)
  {
  	int i;
-	unsigned long val;
-
  ...
+	unsigned long buff[SNMP_MIB_MAX];

The order should be "buff" then "i".

@@ -206,10 +217,13 @@ static void snmp6_seq_show_item64(struct seq_file *seq, void __percpu *mib,
  				  const struct snmp_mib *itemlist, size_t syncpoff)
  {
  	int i;
+	u64 buff64[SNMP_MIB_MAX];

Likewise.

I cannot be any more explicit in my request than this.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux