On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:05:32AM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 07:53 PM CEST, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Currently, the processing of multiple chunks in a single SCTP packet
> > leads to multiple calls to sk_data_ready, causing multiple wake up
> > signals which are costly and doesn't make it wake up any faster.
> >
> > With this patch it will notice that the wake up is pending and will do it
> > before leaving the state machine interpreter, latest place possible to
> > do it realiably and cleanly.
> >
> > Note that sk_data_ready events are not dependent on asocs, unlike waking
> > up writers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> > index 7fe56d0acabf66cfd8fe29dfdb45f7620b470ac7..e7042f9ce63b0cfca50cae252f51b60b68cb5731 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
> > @@ -1742,6 +1742,11 @@ out:
> > error = sctp_outq_uncork(&asoc->outqueue, gfp);
> > } else if (local_cork)
> > error = sctp_outq_uncork(&asoc->outqueue, gfp);
> > +
> > + if (sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->pending_data_ready) {
> > + ep->base.sk->sk_data_ready(ep->base.sk);
> > + sctp_sk(ep->base.sk)->pending_data_ready = 0;
> > + }
> > return error;
> > nomem:
> > error = -ENOMEM;
>
> Would it make sense to introduce a local variable for ep->base.sk (and
> make this function 535+1 lines long ;-)
>
> struct sock *sk = ep->base.sk;
>
> ... like sctp_ulpq_tail_event() does?
I guess so, yes. Same for sctp_sk() cast then. I´ll post a new version
later, thanks.
Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
