From: mleitner@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:09:27 -0200 > There is still the other part of this thread to be worked on (re > ->dead), maybe that will justify extra stuff in here but I really > wouldn't like to add extra structures and locks on this just to satisfy > an unreasonable scenario like this. This hash is very busy, the lean it > is, the better. It is never "unreasonable" if it is necessary to fix a real bug, which this is. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
