From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 14:03:43 -0500 > You sure can disagree with me, but calling my opinion 'incredily > stupid' is not wise. I think fundamentally giving facilities less rather than more coverage is not a smart approach at all. If the code is that bad that people are discouraged from even using it, then it should be moved to drivers/staging or removed. Otherwise it must work and we must be able to make use of it. > I understand we would love to do that, but what is the hurry for > SCTP, that needed rhashtable so desperately that it could not be > done before 2016 ? There is no rush, but quite frankly finding people to do serious work on SCTP is no easy task so I'm hesitant to "defer" someone's work in this area... :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
