Re: memory leak in do_ipv6_setsockopt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/01/2015 02:36 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 13:27 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
Hello,

The following program causes a memory leak :

// autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
#include <syscall.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <linux/in.h>
#include <linux/socket.h>

int main()
{
         long r1 = syscall(SYS_socket, PF_INET6,
SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, IPPROTO_SCTP);
         const char *opt = "\x15\x53\x5e\x2d\x97\xab\xe1";
         long r3 = syscall(SYS_setsockopt, r1, 0x29ul, 0x6ul, opt, 0x7ul);
         return 0;
}


unreferenced object 0xffff880039a55260 (size 64):
   comm "executor", pid 11746, jiffies 4298984475 (age 16.078s)
   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
     2f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  /...............
     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
   backtrace:
     [<     inline     >] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:463
     [<ffffffff848a2f5f>] sock_kmalloc+0x7f/0xc0 net/core/sock.c:1774
     [<ffffffff84e5bea0>] do_ipv6_setsockopt.isra.7+0x15d0/0x2830
net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:483
     [<ffffffff84e5d19b>] ipv6_setsockopt+0x9b/0x140 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:885
     [<ffffffff8544616c>] sctp_setsockopt+0x15c/0x36c0 net/sctp/socket.c:3702
     [<ffffffff848a2035>] sock_common_setsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2645
     [<     inline     >] SYSC_setsockopt net/socket.c:1757
     [<ffffffff8489f1d8>] SyS_setsockopt+0x158/0x240 net/socket.c:1736


I confirmed that running this program in a loop steadily increases
number of objects in kmalloc-64 slab. The leak does not happen with
IPPROTO_TCP, so probably it is sctp-related.

Thanks for the report.

Probably fixed by :

diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 897c01c029ca..8079ecd8465d 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -7375,6 +7375,12 @@ struct proto sctp_prot = {

  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)

+static void sctp_v6_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	sctp_destroy_sock(sk);
+	inet6_destroy_sock(sk);
+}

Yeah, we miss inet6_destroy_sock() in SCTP. :-(

Looks good to me.

  struct proto sctpv6_prot = {
  	.name		= "SCTPv6",
  	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
@@ -7384,7 +7390,7 @@ struct proto sctpv6_prot = {
  	.accept		= sctp_accept,
  	.ioctl		= sctp_ioctl,
  	.init		= sctp_init_sock,
-	.destroy	= sctp_destroy_sock,
+	.destroy	= sctp_v6_destroy_sock,
  	.shutdown	= sctp_shutdown,
  	.setsockopt	= sctp_setsockopt,
  	.getsockopt	= sctp_getsockopt,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux