On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:03:14AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:50:16AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote: ... > > I am not familiar enough with DLM and its history, but my question is this: > > If dlm always peels off a socket for a new associations, why is it using > > 1-to-many api in the first place? Doing a quick scan of DLM lowcoms code > > for sctp specific things, I see nothing that has specific dependencies > > on 1-to-many api. It might be simpler to switch to using 1-to-1 api, similar > > to dlm tcp and eliminate this dependency. > > > > Is that a naive point of view? > > Not at all, that's a very good question. I also don't know much of DLM > code itself, I'll check that. Sounds like DLM is using 1-to-many just in an attempt to use multi-homing, but we can do that with 1-to-1 too. I'll draft a patch and see how it goes, and perhaps with that we can avoid/postpone this question regarding indirect call to sctp_do_peeloff by kernel. Marcelo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
