Is it an update of lksctp can help? or I should need to patch the kernel? On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Sun Paul <paulrbk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > The version I used is 1.0.10 > > lksctp-tools-doc-1.0.10-7.el6.x86_64 > lksctp-tools-1.0.10-7.el6.x86_64 > lksctp-tools-devel-1.0.10-7.el6.x86_64 > > > can you direct me on where I can get more information on the patch and > where to download it? > > Thanks > > - paul > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Gomonovych, Vasyl (Nokia - > PL/Wroclaw) <vasyl.gomonovych@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hello. >> >> I do not know which version you use. >> But I observe similar issue and in my case >> it was problem with sk_ack_backlog >> sctp-Fix-sk_ack_backlog-wrap-around-problem.patch >> >> With best regards Vasyl. >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: linux-sctp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [linux-sctp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of ext Daniel Borkmann [daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 4:30 PM >> To: Sun Paul >> Cc: linux-sctp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: NO TCB to Destory >> >> On 06/18/2015 12:20 PM, Sun Paul wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I suffered a case on a SCTP connection. >>> >>> HOST A sends INIT chunk to HOST B >>> HOST B returns INIT_ACK chunk back to HOST A >>> HOST A sends COOKIE_ECHO chunk to HOST B >>> HOST B then send ABORT chunk with T-bit set to 1. >>> >>> Any idea on why ABORT chunk is sent out? >> >> Do you have a reliable, minimal reproducer? >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
