Re: [PATCH net-next] Removed unused function sctp_addr_is_valid()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 04:29:24PM +0200, Sébastien Barré wrote:
> sctp_addr_is_valid() only appeared in its definition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sébastien Barré <sebastien.barre@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
>  include/net/sctp/structs.h | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> index 4ff3f67..806e3b5 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> @@ -1116,7 +1116,6 @@ int sctp_raw_to_bind_addrs(struct sctp_bind_addr *bp, __u8 *raw, int len,
>  sctp_scope_t sctp_scope(const union sctp_addr *);
>  int sctp_in_scope(struct net *net, const union sctp_addr *addr, const sctp_scope_t scope);
>  int sctp_is_any(struct sock *sk, const union sctp_addr *addr);
> -int sctp_addr_is_valid(const union sctp_addr *addr);
>  int sctp_is_ep_boundall(struct sock *sk);
>  
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  
> -- 
> tg: (64b1f00..) net-next/removed-unused-sctp-function (depends on: net-next/master)
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux