From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 10:38:10 -0500 > This fixes the issue for the accept() case, but the bug is still there > in the peeloff case. > > I think you should make sctp_copy_sock() use sock_copy() for now. It > looks like it will catch all the cases. > > We can then look at possibly getting rid of sctp_copy_sock() for net-next. Agreed, it looks like a lot of hair exists because sctp tries to use custom code to copy sockets. Getting away from this will fix this address problem as well as things like the pacing rate being wrong as Eric Dumazet mentioned. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
