Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] sctp: remove the else path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013/11/8 11:00, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:55 +0800, Wang Weidong wrote:
>> Make the code more simplification.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  net/sctp/associola.c | 4 +---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
>> index 667f984..2d53d4c 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
>> @@ -954,15 +954,13 @@ int sctp_cmp_addr_exact(const union sctp_addr *ss1,
>>   */
>>  struct sctp_chunk *sctp_get_ecne_prepend(struct sctp_association *asoc)
>>  {
>> -	struct sctp_chunk *chunk;
>> +	struct sctp_chunk *chunk = NULL;
>>  
>>  	/* Send ECNE if needed.
>>  	 * Not being able to allocate a chunk here is not deadly.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (asoc->need_ecne)
>>  		chunk = sctp_make_ecne(asoc, asoc->last_ecne_tsn);
>> -	else
>> -		chunk = NULL;
>>  
>>  	return chunk;
>>  }
> 
> If you really want to make the code simple how about:
> 
> struct sctp_chunk *sctp_get_ecne_prepend(struct sctp_association *asoc)
> {
> 	if (!asoc->need_ecne)
> 		return NULL;
> 
> 	return sctp_make_ecne(asoc, asoc->last_ecne_tsn);
> }
> 
> 

Yeah, you are right. I will fix it in v2.
Thanks. 

> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux