Re: Association issue.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:33:50AM +0530, Vipul Singhania wrote:
> Thanks for reply.
> 
> There is no firewall in that network. This is just separate network.
> and I can say they are directly connected to each other using L1
> switch and no other connection to outside world.
> 
> It was jut testing that I have giving public IP to one of interface in one host.
> 
> - The association look like with public IP.
> 
> sh-3.2# cat /proc/net/sctp/assocs
>  ASSOC     SOCK   STY SST ST HBKT ASSOC-ID TX_QUEUE RX_QUEUE UID INODE
> LPORT RPORT LADDRS <-> RADDRS HBINT INS OUTS MAXRT T1X T2X RTXC
> ffff8800089b0000 ffff8800335944c0 2   1   3  37916    3      516
>  0       0 10635 48520  7168  127.3.253.1 127.3.21.1 127.4.253.1
> 127.2.253.1 127.1.221.1 164.48.1.1 127.3.254.1 <-> *127.4.252.1
>  7500   300   300   10    0    0        0
> ffff8800089b2000 ffff880033594000 2   1   3  50717    4      516
>  0       0 10634 60890  7169  127.3.253.1 127.3.21.1 127.4.253.1
> 127.2.253.1 127.1.221.1 164.48.1.1 127.3.254.1 <-> *127.4.252.1
>  7500   300   300   10    0    0        0
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - But if I give private IP (10.1.1.1) this look like.
> 
> sh-3.2# cat /proc/net/sctp/assocs
>  ASSOC     SOCK   STY SST ST HBKT ASSOC-ID TX_QUEUE RX_QUEUE UID INODE
> LPORT RPORT LADDRS <-> RADDRS HBINT INS OUTS MAXRT T1X T2X RTXC
> ffff88003c721800 ffff8800335944c0 2   1   3  22045    2        0
>  0       0  5674 47434  7169  127.3.253.1 127.3.21.1 127.4.253.1
> 127.2.253.1 127.1.221.1 <-> *127.4.252.1         7500   300   300   10
>    0    0        0
> ffff88003c720800 ffff880033594000 2   1   3  36124    1        0
>  0       0  5673 58513  7168  127.3.253.1 127.3.21.1 127.4.253.1
> 127.2.253.1 127.1.221.1 <-> *127.4.252.1         7500   300   300   10
>    0    0        0
> 
I don't see any difference between the two environments here.  How exactly are
you 'giving' a private ip here?  Are you attempting an ADDIP operation?

> 
> - I may be wrong but is it possible that when we do bind with on IP
> (and if multi homing is enabled) it'll build with all available
> interfaces?
> 
The opposite in fact.  If you bind to a local address the association on that
socket will be creating using only the bound address, if you do not bind on a
local address (the autobind case), and multihoming is enabled, then all
available addresses will be used.

Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux