On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 06:39:03PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:55:15 +0200 > > > Mostly it's all about getting rid of unnecessary code, and/or making > > it more clean and readable. > > > > Code has been tested with lksctp-tools functional test suite and > > also my small sctp stress test helper that was used to discover > > the recent null-ptr derefs. This test was also sucessfully run against > > auth_enabled=0 and auth_enabled=1, where I also previously applied > > the following two patches: > > > > - http://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=137121898331017&w=2 > > -> not yet applied, still pending review for crypto tree > > - 1abd165 (net: sctp: fix NULL pointer dereference in socket destruction) > > -> cherry picked from net tree > > > > Daniel Borkmann (5): > > net: sctp: remove TEST_FRAME ifdef > > ktime: add ms_to_ktime() and ktime_add_ms() helpers > > net: sctp: migrate cookie life from timeval to ktime > > net: sctp: decouple cleaning socket data from endpoint > > net: sctp: minor: sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs add missing newline > > The discussion of this patch series has taken a tangent towards a > talk about how to do TX based socket accounting differently. > > While that's interesting, it'd be good to get ACKs for Daniel's > patches meanwhile, I think they are fine personally. Yeah, given that the sk_wmem_alloc thing has been clarified for me, it looks ok to me For the series Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
