On 02/12/2013 06:30 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
We walk through the bind address list and try to get the best source
address for a given destination. However, currently, we take the
'continue' path of the loop when an entry is invalid (!laddr->valid)
*and* the entry state does not equal SCTP_ADDR_SRC (laddr->state !=
SCTP_ADDR_SRC).
Thus, still, invalid entries with SCTP_ADDR_SRC might not 'continue'
as well as valid entries with SCTP_ADDR_{NEW, SRC, DEL}, with a possible
false baddr and matchlen as a result, causing in worst case dst route
to be false or possibly NULL.
This test should actually be a '||' instead of '&&'. But lets fix it
and make this a bit easier to read by having the condition the same way
as similarly done in sctp_v4_get_dst.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
It uses || everywhere else except this one case. I don't know what I
was thinking when I wrote that one.... :)
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sctp/ipv6.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
index f3f0f4d..391a245 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
@@ -326,9 +326,10 @@ static void sctp_v6_get_dst(struct sctp_transport *t, union sctp_addr *saddr,
*/
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(laddr, &bp->address_list, list) {
- if (!laddr->valid && laddr->state != SCTP_ADDR_SRC)
+ if (!laddr->valid)
continue;
- if ((laddr->a.sa.sa_family == AF_INET6) &&
+ if ((laddr->state == SCTP_ADDR_SRC) &&
+ (laddr->a.sa.sa_family == AF_INET6) &&
(scope <= sctp_scope(&laddr->a))) {
bmatchlen = sctp_v6_addr_match_len(daddr, &laddr->a);
if (!baddr || (matchlen < bmatchlen)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
