Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > David Miller wrote: >> From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) >> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:25:11 -0800 >> >>> The typo is fixed in the patch this time in addition to my test >>> tree. >> >> Applied, thanks for fixing this up Eric. > > I did check now how come that I patched my 3.7.4 on Jan 24. Looks like > -head or -next has different namings. For me, the original patch applied > fine. So far I haven't hit the memleak although it happened only once to me > before the patch. The problem isn't that the patch doesn't apply the problem is that the patch did not build. The naming has not changed in the git history. > But probably I can confirm say Tested-by:. > > # > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8435 Jan 24 17:12 /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/net/sctp/sysctl.c > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 8347 Jan 21 20:45 /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/net/sctp/sysctl.c.orig > # ls -la /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/net/sctp/sysctl.o > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 246144 Jan 21 22:37 /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/net/sctp/sysctl.o > # ls -la /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/arch/x86/boot/bzImage > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3794592 Jan 21 22:45 /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/arch/x86/boot/bzImage > # It doesn't look look like you rebuilt anything after you applied the changes to net/sctp/sysctl.c. sysctl.o and bzImage are both 3 days older. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
