Re: [PATCH] sctp: Clean up type-punning in sctp_cmd_t union

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:00:13AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] sctp: Clean up type-punning in sctp_cmd_t union
> ...
> > +#define SCTP_NULL_BYTE 0xAA
> >  static inline sctp_arg_t SCTP_NULL(void)
> >  {
> > -	sctp_arg_t retval; retval.ptr = NULL; return retval;
> > +	sctp_arg_t retval;
> > +	memset(&retval, SCTP_NULL_BYTE, sizeof(sctp_arg_t));
> > +	return retval;
> >  }
> 
> You really don't want to be taking the address of a local
> variable that would normally be held in a register.
> It stops the compiler doing a lot of optimisations.
> In this case the structure is also being returned by value,
> not nice except that all(?) modern ABI do pass small structures
> in registers.
> 
Thank you dave, I hadn't considered the implications of missed optimizations
when storing to a register here.

> An assignment of some member of the union to NULL would
> seem most appropriate.
> OTOH the code that uses this must be someones 'bright idea (tm)'
> that probably wasn't such a good idea after all.
> 
nobody uses it currently, Its just that some state machine side effects don't
require an argument, but you still have to pass one in, so I was trying to
enhance this to make it obvious in a backtrace should someone inadvertently use
it in the future.  I'm going to revert it though, a big fat zero is probably
just as clear.
Neil

> 	David
> 
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux