Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:52:20 +0200

> Le 17/09/2012 20:25, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:14:35 -0400
>>
>>> I think he expected you to take Eric's patch that removed those
>>> pieces.
>>
>> Eric's patch was a cleanup, so it went into 'net-next'.
>>
>> Nicolas's patch is a bonafide bug fix so needs to be
>> targetted at 'net'
> My fault, it was 'net-next'. I will rebase them against 'net'.
> 
> Should I post the last one (4/4) separately, against net-next? Because
> without the '3/4', the cleanup is a bit larger and will cause a
> conflict during the merge.

Actually Nicolas, hold off on this for a bit.

I'm reconsidering putting Eric's patch into 'net' and that would
allow me to use your v3 patches as-is.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux