Thanks all! David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx> >Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:18:12 -0400 > >> Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>I've seen several attempts recently made to do quick failover of sctp >>>transports >>>by reducing various retransmit timers and counters. While its >possible >>>to >>>implement a faster failover on multihomed sctp associations, its not >>>particularly robust, in that it can lead to unneeded retransmits, as >>>well as >>>false connection failures due to intermittent latency on a network. >>> >>>Instead, lets implement the new ietf quick failover draft found here: >>>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover-05 >>> >>>This will let the sctp stack identify transports that have had a >small >>>number of >>>errors, and avoid using them quickly until their reliability can be >>>re-established. I've tested this out on two virt guests connected >via >>>multiple >>>isolated virt networks and believe its in compliance with the above >>>draft and >>>works well. >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ... >> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx> > >Applied, thanks everyone. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
