From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:01:13 -0500 > > > On 12/20/2011 04:39 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:00:48PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote: >>> I saw you discussed this with Vlad in old mail: >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sctp/msg01365.html >>> >>> You said you will update patch to include a per packet overhead, >>> but it does not include in this patch, what's wrong with in? >> >> It's not possible because upon retransmission of a chunk we need >> to readd the overhead to the rwnd. There is no longer a reference >> to a packet so we can't know how much to add. This explanation is >> also in the original mail thread. >> > > > Right. The original patches were done to work around the problem of > leftover rwnd when socket buffer is exhausted and they didn't really > address the problem sufficiently. It was still possible to reach that > condition. Some subsequent patches added support to address this > issue > a different way. As a result, I think this revert is just fine. > > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@xxxxxx> Applied, thanks everyone. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
