On 07/06/2011 11:49 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:31:56AM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote: >>>>> + * >>>>> + * Allow the association to timeout if SHUTDOWN is >>>>> + * pending in case the receiver stays in zero window >>>>> + * mode forever. >>>>> */ >>>>> if (!q->asoc->peer.rwnd && >>>>> !list_empty(&tlist) && >>>>> - (sack_ctsn+2 == q->asoc->next_tsn)) { >>>>> + (sack_ctsn+2 == q->asoc->next_tsn) && >>>>> + !(q->asoc->state >= SCTP_STATE_SHUTDOWN_PENDING)) { >>>> >>>> Would a test for (q->asoc->state != SCTP_STATE_SHUTDOWN_PENDING) be clearer? We only >>>> care about the PENDING state here. >>> >>> I think SHUTDOWN_RECEIVED should also be included. We continue to transmit and >>> process SACKs after receiving a SHUTDOWN. >> >> I am not sure about SHUTDOWN_RECEIVED. If we received shutdown, then we are not in >> a 0 window situation. Additionally, the sender of the SHUTDOWN started the GUARD timer >> and will abort after it expires. So there is no special handling on our part. > > Why can't we be in a 0 window situation? A well behaving sctp peer may not, > but we're on the Internet, everyone behaves at their worst :-) > > Seriously, this would make for a simple dos. Establish a stream, don't ack any > data to make sure there is something on the retransmission queue of the peer. > Immediately shutdown the stream and ack any retransmission attempt with > a_rwnd=0 to keep the association around forever. > > Starting the T5 SHUTDOWN GUARD timer is specified as MAY and not MUST so even in > a well behaving world we could not really rely on it. > > Alternatively the peer could just be buggy as well. > You are right. Without a receiver patch, a linux receiver would stay in 0-window condition while sending a SHUTDOWN with a_rwnd of 0. How about instead of checking for "Not greater then or equals", we instead simply test for "less then"? -vlad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html