On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:11:06AM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote: > On 06/30/2011 09:31 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:14:41PM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote: > >> Right. The lack of ABORT from the receive of data is a bug. I was trying to point out > >> that instead of modified the sender of data to send the ABORT, you modify the receiver > >> to send the ABORT when it is being closed while having data queued. > > > > Is this what you had in mind? > > Almost. It could really be a simple true/false condition about recvqueue or inqueue > being non-empty. If that's the case, trigger abort. What would be the advantage of that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
