From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500 > This has already been suggested, and I agree it is a much better > approach. If I take this approach, and find some suitable substitute > for those cases where the socket inode is not available, will you > consider these changes? I will consider an approach where the keys reported allow object tracking equally as the actual pointers allow for right now. I've said that this is my criteria about 3 times now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
