"new_addr" is the list cursor here and it's always non-NULL.
We're trying to test if we exited because the loop ended or we hit the
break statement. Really testing !found is enough so long as
"new_asoc->peer.transport_addr_list" is not empty and I believe it never
is empty at this point. So this is never really a bug with the current
code.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Compile tested only.
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index 24b2cd5..cb76d2e 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -1254,7 +1254,6 @@ static int sctp_sf_check_restart_addrs(const struct sctp_association *new_asoc,
/* Search through all current addresses and make sure
* we aren't adding any new ones.
*/
- new_addr = NULL;
found = 0;
list_for_each_entry(new_addr, &new_asoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
@@ -1273,7 +1272,8 @@ static int sctp_sf_check_restart_addrs(const struct sctp_association *new_asoc,
}
/* If a new address was added, ABORT the sender. */
- if (!found && new_addr) {
+ if (!found &&
+ &new_addr->transports != &new_asoc->peer.transport_addr_list) {
sctp_sf_send_restart_abort(&new_addr->ipaddr, init, commands);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
