On 07/23/2010 04:50 AM, Shan Wei wrote: > RFC5061 said that If the received ASCONF Chunk is not associated with > any association, the Chunk should be treated as OOTB. So, process > this OOTB chunk according to section 8.4 of RFC4960. > > Quote from RFC5061: > 5.2. Upon Reception of an ASCONF Chunk > D3) If neither D1, D2, nor D2-ext locates the association, treat the > chunk as an Out Of The Blue packet as defined in [RFC4960]. > > > Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <shanwei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > net/sctp/sm_statetable.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statetable.c b/net/sctp/sm_statetable.c > index 6d9b3aa..ca300db 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_statetable.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statetable.c > @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static const sctp_sm_table_entry_t chunk_event_table[SCTP_NUM_BASE_CHUNK_TYPES][ > /* SCTP_STATE_EMPTY */ \ > TYPE_SCTP_FUNC(sctp_sf_ootb), \ > /* SCTP_STATE_CLOSED */ \ > - TYPE_SCTP_FUNC(sctp_sf_discard_chunk), \ > + TYPE_SCTP_FUNC(sctp_sf_ootb), \ > /* SCTP_STATE_COOKIE_WAIT */ \ > TYPE_SCTP_FUNC(sctp_sf_discard_chunk), \ > /* SCTP_STATE_COOKIE_ECHOED */ \ Same should probably be done for ASCONF_ACK as well.... -vlad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
