Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò wrote: > Il giorno gio, 24/06/2010 alle 09.40 -0400, Vlad Yasevich ha scritto: >> You don't call accept() on an SCTP SEQPACKET socket. You can just >> read from it. > > Okay I guess I'll send a patch to the man page to fix that then. I don't think the man page needs an update. This is just an SCTP-ism. There are other protocols using SOCK_SEQPACKET that implement and support accept() call. The SCTP api spec decided that it wouldn't support accept() and we have to follow it. > >> This way, you'll ignore listening SOCK_STREAM sockets which will not >> have any >> data anyway, but you'll check out listening SOCK_SEQPACKET sockets >> that may have >> data waiting on them. > > Ah I think I see what you mean here: SIOCINQ would work for TCP-style > ESTABLISHED sockets _and_ SEQPACKET LISTENING sockets, right? Right. -vlad > > Will send the updated patch in a moment. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
