Wei Yongjun wrote, at 05/17/2010 02:14 PM: > > 于 2010年05月17日 14:08, Shan Wei 写道: >> The comment about sctp_sf_violation_paramlen() is wrong. >> >> Invalid length should be identified as it does not equal actual length >> of a given parameter. The actual length of a given parameter is not including >> the padding part. >> > > Not right. If the param length is larger then what is request, we > also treat it as correct. And for unkonw params, we just check > the length larger then the minimal length. >From the code of sctp_verify_asconf(), I saw that if length value of any parameter in chunk is not equal true length, sctp_verify_asconf() return 0. @@sctp_verify_asconf() 3045 if (param.v > chunk_end - length || 3046 length < sizeof(sctp_paramhdr_t)) 3047 return 0; -- Best Regards ----- Shan Wei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
