Re: retrans path update problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Gui Jianfeng wrote:
>> hello everybody,
>> When updating retrans path(asoc->peer.retran_path), should we update
>> the retran path to another transport even if only the original retrans
>> path is active?
>> In the other words, i think, retrans path should always be changed if
>> there are more than one transport in an association.
>>
>> Am i right?
> 
> And we do that with sctp_assoc_update_retran_path().  If we
> don't find another active transport, we'll still try set the
> retran_path to the next transport in the list.
> 
> Are you asking if we should only use ACTIVE transports?

Vlad,  
  I'd like to know, if the current asoc->peer.retran_path is the only active
  transport in the transport list, whether we should change asoc->peer.retran_path 
  to another inactive one. The sctp_assoc_update_retran_path() won't change to a 
  inactive transport(next one) in this scenario now, is that ok?
> 
> -vlad
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Regards
Gui Jianfeng

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     SCTP

  Powered by Linux