[PATCH 0/3] wireless: Use complete() instead complete_all()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

Using complete_all() is not wrong per se but it suggest that there
might be more than one waiter. For -rt I am reviewing all
complete_all() users and would like to leave only the real ones in the
tree. The main problem for -rt about complete_all() is that it can be
uses inside IRQ context and that can lead to unbounded amount work
inside the interrupt handler. That is a no no for -rt.

The patches grouped per subsystem and in small batches to allow
reviewing.

Patch #1 fixes a minor bug in the completion API usage. The current code
works but it could work better.

cheers,
daniel

Daniel Wagner (3):
  csiostor: fix completion usage
  sym53c8xx_2: use complete() instead complete_all()
  virtio_scsi: use complete() instead complete_all()

 drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_scsi.c   | 5 ++---
 drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c | 2 +-
 drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c          | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux