On 8/11/2016 2:22 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
+ queue->work_q = alloc_workqueue("ntfc%d.%d.%d", 0, 0, + assoc->tgtport->fc_target_port.port_num, + assoc->a_id, qid);Do we really need a workqueue per queue?
I thought we did - so there was always an execution context for the nvmet layer when a command is received. My understanding was the nvmet layer processes the cmd synchronously. I avoided per cpu - as I assumed the synchronous flows would end up blocking other connections to other subsystems/controllers.
If that's not the case - can you describe the nvmet layer better so I understand what we need ?
No reference counting?
yes - will make a pass at it. -- james -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
