On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 11:32 +0530, Jitendra Bhivare wrote: > Thanks Joe for taking this up. It has been pending for long time from our > side. Thanks, not a problem, it took ~10 minutes. There was a bit of an issue about your reply though. First there was ~50 k of quoted stuff without any content > [ hundreds and hundreds of quoted lines ] and then this happened: > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/be2iscsi/be_main.h > b/drivers/scsi/be2iscsi/be_main.h > > > > index aa9c682..7cce6e3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/be2iscsi/be_main.h > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/be2iscsi/be_main.h > > @@ -1081,15 +1081,19 @@ struct hwi_context_memory { > > #define BEISCSI_LOG_CONFIG 0x0020 /* CONFIG Code Path */ > > #define BEISCSI_LOG_ISCSI 0x0040 /* SCSI/iSCSI Protocol related > Logs */ > > > > > > -#define __beiscsi_log(phba, level, fmt, ...) \ > > - shost_printk(level, phba->shost, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > > - > > -#define beiscsi_log(phba, level, mask, prefix, fmt, ...) \ > > +#define beiscsi_printk(level, phba, mask, fmt, ...) \ > > do { \ > > - uint32_t log_value = phba->attr_log_enable; \ > > - if (((mask) & log_value) || (level[1] <= '3')) \ > > - __beiscsi_log(phba, level, prefix "_%d: " fmt, \ > > - __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ > > + if ((mask) & (phba)->attr_log_enable) \ > > + shost_printk(level, phba->shost, \ > [JB] PCI dev_printk would be more useful with SCSI host_no included by > default in the message. This is a good note that seems simple enough, but I almost missed this. Given the reply at the top and the _very_ long uncommented quoted block, I just about assumed it was a useless block quote that you didn't bother to trim. Please make it easier to find your replies and notes by deleting irrelevant quoted stuff. Also, I think I misread the code. The original code is <= '3' i.e.: show all KERN_ERR. That is not correct in the new code. I don't know the code well and don't have a test bed with the hardware. Is it possible for a beiscsi_<level> message to be called before phba->pcidev is set to a valid value in beiscsi_hba_alloc? It appears the code is careful to only use dev_<level> logging calls before probe. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html