Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sd: check BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS against max_dev_sectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Tom" == tom ty89 <tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

Tom,

Tom> The SCSI disk driver sets max_sectors to BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS when
Tom> the device does not report Optimal Transfer Length. However, it
Tom> checks only whether it is smaller than max_hw_sectors, but not
Tom> max_dev_sectors.

It would be pretty unusual for a device that is smart enough to report a
transfer length limit to be constrained to 1 MB and change.

@@ -2875,8 +2875,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
 	    logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks) >= PAGE_SIZE) {
 		q->limits.io_opt = logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
 		rw_max = logical_to_sectors(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
-	} else
+	} else {
 		rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
+		/* Combine with device limits */
+		rw_max = min(rw_max, q->limits.max_dev_sectors);
+	}
 
 	/* Combine with controller limits */
 	q->limits.max_sectors = min(rw_max, queue_max_hw_sectors(q));

If you want to fix this please drop the braces and do:

		rw_max = min(BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS, q->limits.max_dev_sectors);

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux