----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Laurence Oberman" <loberman@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Johannes Thumshirn" > <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 6:39:07 PM > Subject: Re: [dm-devel] dm-mq and end_clone_request() > > On 08/08/2016 08:26 AM, Laurence Oberman wrote: > > I will test this as well. > > I have lost my DDN array today (sadly:)) but I have two systems > > back to back again using ramdisk on the one to serve LUNS. > > > > If I pull from https://github.com/bvanassche/linux again, and > > switch branch to srp-initiator-for-next, will I get all Mikes > > latest patches from last week + this. I guess I can just check > > myself, but might as well just ask. > > Hello Laurence, > > Sorry but I do not yet have a fix available for the scsi_forget_host() > crash you reported in an earlier e-mail. But Mike's latest patches > including the patch below are now available at > https://github.com/bvanassche/linux in the srp-initiator-for-next > branch. Further feedback is welcome. > > Thanks, > > Bart. > > [PATCH] Check invariants at runtime > > Warn if sdev->sdev_state != SDEV_DEL when __scsi_remove_device() > returns. Check whether all __scsi_remove_device() callers hold the > scan_mutex. > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > index 82209ad4..a21e321 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > @@ -1312,6 +1312,8 @@ void __scsi_remove_device(struct scsi_device *sdev) > { > struct device *dev = &sdev->sdev_gendev, *sdp = NULL; > > + lockdep_assert_held(&sdev->host->scan_mutex); > + > /* > * This cleanup path is not reentrant and while it is impossible > * to get a new reference with scsi_device_get() someone can still > @@ -1321,8 +1323,11 @@ void __scsi_remove_device(struct scsi_device *sdev) > return; > > if (sdev->is_visible) { > - if (scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_CANCEL) != 0) > + if (scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_CANCEL) != 0) { > + WARN_ONCE(sdev->sdev_state != SDEV_DEL, > + "sdev state %d\n", sdev->sdev_state); > return; > + } > > bsg_unregister_queue(sdev->request_queue); > sdp = scsi_get_ulpdev(dev); > @@ -1339,6 +1344,8 @@ void __scsi_remove_device(struct scsi_device *sdev) > * device. > */ > scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_DEL); > + WARN_ONCE(sdev->sdev_state != SDEV_DEL, "sdev state %d\n", > + sdev->sdev_state); > blk_cleanup_queue(sdev->request_queue); > cancel_work_sync(&sdev->requeue_work); > > -- > 2.9.2 > Hello Bart No problem Sir. I did apply the patch just to help you test and so far it been stable. I will revert it and carry on my debugging of the dm issue. I do have the other patches in the original pull request I took so I am running with all Mike's patches. Many Thanks as always for all the help you provide all of us. Thanks Laurence -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
