Re: [PATCH resend 1/5] libata-scsi: minor cleanup in ata_mselect_*()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This patch should cause no behavioral change. Even the (removal of)
the redundant bit mask should be a nop. So it seems like a bit of an
overkill to split them.

On 22 July 2016 at 02:45, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/21/2016 09:41 PM, tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> 1. Removed a repeated bit masking in ata_mselect_control()
>> 2. Moved `wce`/`d_sense` assignment below the page validity checks
>> 3. Added/Removed empty lines where appropriate
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>    Perhaps Tejun is OK with that, but if you ask me doing 1 task per patch
> is a better practice.
>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergei
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux