On Sat, Jul 16 2016 at 2:14pm -0400, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2016-07-16 at 14:10 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 15 2016 at 9:08pm -0400, > > Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:03:54PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > > > > > > > > "Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > > Christoph> I was a bit overeager to thing ALL_TG_PT would solve > > > > all our > > > > Christoph> multipathing woes in respect to persistent > > > > reservation. > > > > Christoph> Turns out that there are lots of possible setups where > > > > it > > > > Christoph> doesn't work, and we'll have to ask device mapper to > > > > register > > > > Christoph> all underlying devices instead. > > > > > > > > Should I queue the sd patch or let Mike take both through the DM > > > > tree? > > > > > > I think having both in the same tree would be very useful. I don't > > > care which one that is. > > > > I've picked both of them up. Staged for 4.8 merge and in linux-next > > via linux-dm.git's 'for-next'. > > > > (I added Martin's Acked-by to the sd patch header, Martin: if not OK, > > or if you'd prefer Reviewed-by just let me know) > > You are actually missing the reviewed by tags from Mike Christie on > this, which should be added. Added, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
