Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata-scsi: do not return designator for serial number

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:12:12AM +0800, tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> SAT (as of sat4r05f.pdf) does not require this vendor specific
> designator. Besides, we already have the Unit Serial Number VPD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index bfec66f..9f478ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -2210,14 +2210,6 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsiop_inq_83(struct ata_scsi_args *args, u8 *rbuf)
>  	rbuf[1] = 0x83;			/* this page code */
>  	num = 4;
>  
> -	/* piv=0, assoc=lu, code_set=ACSII, designator=vendor */
> -	rbuf[num + 0] = 2;
> -	rbuf[num + 3] = ATA_ID_SERNO_LEN;
> -	num += 4;
> -	ata_id_string(args->id, (unsigned char *) rbuf + num,
> -		      ATA_ID_SERNO, ATA_ID_SERNO_LEN);
> -	num += ATA_ID_SERNO_LEN;
> -

If it isn't actually broken, I don't want to change it.  It's a
userland visible change which is gratuitous.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux