Re: [PATCH 1/2] sd: don't use the ALL_TG_PT bit for reservations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/08/2016 07:23 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> These only work if the we use the same initiator ID for all path,
> which might not be true if we use different protocols, or even just
> different HBAs.
> 
> Instead dm-mpath will grow support to register all path manually
> later in this series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/sd.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 60bff78..42b4d05 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -1613,8 +1613,7 @@ static int sd_pr_register(struct block_device *bdev, u64 old_key, u64 new_key,
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	return sd_pr_command(bdev, (flags & PR_FL_IGNORE_KEY) ? 0x06 : 0x00,
>  			old_key, new_key, 0,
> -			(1 << 0) /* APTPL */ |
> -			(1 << 2) /* ALL_TG_PT */);
> +			(1 << 0) /* APTPL */);
>  }
>  
>  static int sd_pr_reserve(struct block_device *bdev, u64 key, enum pr_type type,
> 

Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux