[PATCH 2/2] libata-scsi: do not response with "invalid field" for FORMAT UNIT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx>

It does not make sense and is confusing to response with "Invalid
field in cbd" while we have no support at all implemented for
FORMAT UNIT. It is decent to let it go to the default, which
will response with "Invalid command operation code" instead.

Signed-off-by: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 80d732c..f70f9d1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -4045,11 +4045,6 @@ void ata_scsi_simulate(struct ata_device *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 	args.done = cmd->scsi_done;
 
 	switch(scsicmd[0]) {
-	/* TODO: worth improving? */
-	case FORMAT_UNIT:
-		ata_scsi_invalid_field(dev, cmd, 0);
-		break;
-
 	case INQUIRY:
 		if (scsicmd[1] & 2)		   /* is CmdDt set?  */
 		    ata_scsi_invalid_field(dev, cmd, 1);
-- 
2.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux