On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:18:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:48:42AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >Ah, ok, so it's for enabling real hardware, not just a cleanup, right? You might >> >want to put that info into the boilerplate mail or so. >> > >> >I'm perfectly fine with all the patches that touch x86 code: >> > >> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >I suppose you'd like to have these in the driver tree, all in one place? >> > >> >Thanks, >> > >> > Ingo >> >> Ah yes, in retrospect I should have made it clear that this was for >> supporting hardware rather than simply code cleanup. That was an >> oversight on my part not to have made it more explicit. >> >> Introducing everything to the driver tree would be most convenient, thus >> allowing me to quickly release my subsequent patches which will be >> rebased on top of these. > >Ok, I can take these. > >thanks, > >greg k-h Forgive me for probing again; what is that status of this patchset? I'm anxious to see them accepted to prevent the regression introduced by the ISA_BUS configuration option from appearing in the next merge window. Many thanks, William Breathitt Gray -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
