On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 04:07:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 18 April 2016 08:39:32 Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > > I agree. So how should we work around the bug in this case? There have > > been several suggestions: > > > > - change wwn_to_u64() to __always_inline > > > > - change qla2x00_get_host_fabric_name() to skip the unnecessary call to > > wwn_to_u64() > > > > - revert one of the two commits: > > bc27fb68aaad ("include/uapi/linux/byteorder, swab: force inlining of some byteswap operations") > > ef3fb2422ffe ("scsi: fc: use get/put_unaligned64 for wwn access") > > What about the patch to change get_unaligned_be64() that I posted? > > I think we want to merge that anyway, I just don't know if that helps > with this particular problem as well. I replied to your other email about that -- it doesn't seem to help this issue. -- Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html