Re: [PATCH 2/2] IB/iser: set max_segment_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:13:52AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >That's what NVMe does, but I don't think it's a good idea.  Because
> >of the unaligned start into the page this means you have to set the limit
> >to one lower than the actual hardware limit.
> 
> I think this means that there is a mismatch between the current block layer
> limits and what NVMe / RDMA drivers need ...

If we tell the block layer that we can only handle page sized comments
using max_segent_size it should do the right thing.

Now one thing that might be useful is to force the max_segent_size
when setting the virt boundary, as they seem to be closely related.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux