On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:41:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Is this Nick Krause? An email reply that Martin forwarded but the > > > > list didn't pick up (because it had a html part) suggests this. > > > > What you're doing is what got you banned from LKML the last time: > > > > sending patches without evidence there's a problem or understanding > > > > the code you're patching. Repeating the behaviour under a new > > > > identity isn't going to help improve your standing. > > > > > > > No I am not Nick Krause. I am just aware of how he got banned a few > > > years ago. That email was a mistake by typo and was hoping nobody > > > picked it up as they would then believe I was Nick Krause. > > > > Hm, OK, but currently you are repeating his behaviour ... please don't > > send any more patches until they're about real problems backed by > > actual data. > > He's Nick, look at the email headers for proof. > > James, and everyone else, please drop his patches. I'll go get him > banned from vger again. > > Nick, please stop, you have violated the DCO now, a much worse thing > than before. Even if Bastien is going to try to claim that he happens to live in the same house as Nick, the following two patches clearly shows that even if Bastien is violating the DCO by using a fake sock puppet, he's violated the DCO by failing to give Nick credit for writing the identical patch. - Ted
Attachment:
evidence.gz
Description: application/gzip
