This is a follow up to "scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to
scsi_target_state".
If anyone has an idea how to create a regression test suite for the target
removal path I'd be all ears, given the fact that this is the 3rd or 4th patch
targeting it.
Changes to v2:
* Reverse the order of patches as pointed out by James
Changes to v1:
* Fix error (hit BUG_ON()) discovered by the 0-Day bot.
* Revert "scsi: fix soft lockup in scsi_remove_target() on module removal"
Johannes Thumshirn (2):
scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state
Revert "scsi: fix soft lockup in scsi_remove_target() on module
removal"
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 2 ++
drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c | 6 +++---
include/scsi/scsi_device.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
1.8.5.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
