On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:09 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > [resend with linux-scsi@ in Cc, my apologies] > > This is a follow up to "scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state > to scsi_target_state". > > If anyone has an idea how to create a regression test suite for the > target removal path I'd be all ears, given the fact that this is the > 3rd or 4th patch targeting it. Actually, could you reverse the order of these patches, please. It's not safe to revert the soft lockup fix until after the intermediate state is introduced. I'd rather we didn't go through a point in the tree where the bug exists again. Thanks, James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
