On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 13:01 +0200, jthumshirn wrote: > [+Cc linux-scsi back] > On 2016-03-30 02:59, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>>> "Ewan" == Ewan D Milne <emilne@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > Ewan> I would probably use an APCON or other physical layer switch to > > Ewan> drop the FC link and test the error recovery/device loss. But we > > Ewan> don't have one. > > > > They go for a couple of hundred bucks on eBay. I had one of these in a > > previous life and it was awesome. > > Though this would work (like any other FC/FCoE switch) I thought more of > a simulated environment. scsi_debug, Qemu, something like that. You might be able to do something with that but it doesn't quite do the same thing in terms of how a HBA/driver will react to a fault. You also need to be sure there is enough entropy in the timing of when the target goes away. (Otherwise, you could just rmmod scsi_debug...) > > I've had a look at scsi_debug but it seems like it's quite some > refactoring needed to get it to a point where one can simulate target > errors. I kinda like the idea of having something in > tools/testing/selftest but it'll probably end up with a FC switch. > > Johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
