Re: Patch: Make the iscsi lld create a WQ_HIGHPRI workqueue itself

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 03:46 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> We noticed recently while testing with large numbers of iSCSI
>> connections that iscsid was going to heroic lengths to change the nice
>> value of the iSCSI work queue to -20. It becomes very expensive with
>> hundreds of connections.
>>
>> This small patch has the LLD do the work,
>>
>> Feedback welcome.
>>
>> A small patch will be needed for the user-space tools as well. I will
>> send one in if someone else does not do so.
>>
>> -- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
>>
>>
>> 0001-Make-the-iscsi-lld-create-a-WQ_HIGHPRI-workqueue.patch
>>
>>
>> From c0f04a66b29a9190109740c03ee9e65bb62afe28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:36:18 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] Make the iscsi lld create a WQ_HIGHPRI workqueue.
>>
>> The open-iscsi tools go to heroic efforts to change the nice value of
>> the iscsi workqueue to -20. It scans all processes in /proc and
>> when it finds the one it is interested in calls setpriority.
>>
>> When you are connecting to a reasonable number of iSCSI targets this
>> can be costly.
>>
>> This small patch has the iscsi LLD do the work itself. It seems like
>> the least intrusive way to acheive the result.
>>
>> A small patch will be needed in the open-iscsi userspace tools
>> as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c |    4 +++-
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
>> index 6bffd91..abaefe1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
>> @@ -2615,9 +2615,11 @@ struct Scsi_Host *iscsi_host_alloc(struct scsi_host_template *sht,
>>       ihost = shost_priv(shost);
>>
>>       if (xmit_can_sleep) {
>> +             int wq_flags = __WQ_LEGACY | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI;
>
>
> I do not think we need to or are supposed to be setting __WQ_LEGACY. It
> looks like it was only to catch the case here

OK, I will fix that and resubmit.

> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/29/179
>
>
>
>>               snprintf(ihost->workq_name, sizeof(ihost->workq_name),
>>                       "iscsi_q_%d", shost->host_no);
>> -             ihost->workq = create_singlethread_workqueue(ihost->workq_name);
>> +             ihost->workq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("%s", wq_flags,
>> +                                             ihost->workq_name);
>>               if (!ihost->workq)
>>                       goto free_host;
>>       }
>> --
>



-- 
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux