Hi,
On 3/4/2016 9:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 04 March 2016 17:22:18 Joao Pinto wrote:
>> This patch adds a glue platform driver for the Synopsys G210 Test Chip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks basically ok, but I think it can be simplified a little:
>
>> +/**
>> + * struct ufs_hba_dwc_vops - UFS DWC specific variant operations
>> + */
>> +static struct ufs_hba_variant_ops tc_dwc_g210_pltfm_hba_vops = {
>> + .name = "tc-dwc-g210-pltfm",
>> + .link_startup_notify = ufshcd_dwc_link_startup_notify,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * tc_dwc_g210_pltfm_probe()
>> + * @pdev: pointer to platform device structure
>> + *
>> + */
>> +static int tc_dwc_g210_pltfm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + int err;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> +
>> + /* Check Test Chip type and set the specific setup routine */
>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "snps, g210-tc-6.00-20bit")) {
>> + tc_dwc_g210_pltfm_hba_vops.custom_phy_initialization =
>> + tc_dwc_g210_config_20_bit;
>> + } else if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "snps, g210-tc-6.00-40bit")) {
>> + tc_dwc_g210_pltfm_hba_vops.custom_phy_initialization =
>> + tc_dwc_g210_config_40_bit;
>> + }
>
> Instead of manually checking the compatible string, define two copies
> of the ufs_hba_variant_ops, and put a pointer to them into the
> .data field of tc_dwc_g210_pltfm_match.
Sounds nice. I'll do that!
>
> Arnd
>
Joao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
