Re: dm-multipath test scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at  2:42pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 19 2016 at  3:37am -0500,
> Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On 02/19/16 09:33, Nomura Junichi wrote:
> > > On 02/19/16 02:17, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >> What is the last kernel version that your scripts have worked on?
> > > 
> > > v4.4 worked fine. I'll check with v4.5-rc4 when I get a machine.
> > 
> > v4.5-rc4 works fine, too.
> 
> Have you been running with blk-mq?
> Either by setting CONFIG_DM_MQ_DEFAULT or:
> echo Y > /sys/module/dm_mod/parameters/use_blk_mq
> 
> I'm seeing test_02_sdev_delete fail with blk-mq enabled.

I only see failure if I stack dm-mq ontop of old non-mq scsi devices with:

echo N > /sys/module/scsi_mod/parameters/use_blk_mq
echo Y > /sys/module/dm_mod/parameters/use_blk_mq

If I use scsi-mq for the underlying devices all works fine (been testing
the latest dm-4.6 branch though, I'll go back and try stock 4.5-rc4 just
to double check).

But this makes me think the novelty of having dm-mq support stacking on
non-blk-mq devices was misplaced.  It is a senseless config.  I'll
probably remove support for such stacking soon (next week). 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux