On 16/02/2016 15:32, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 02/16/2016 01:22 PM, John Garry wrote:
When TRANS_TX_ERR_FRAME_TXED error occurs for
a command, the command should be re-attempted.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c
index 58e1956..2bf93079b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c
@@ -1190,7 +1190,8 @@ static void sata_done_v2_hw(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba, struct sas_task *task,
/* by default, task resp is complete */
static void slot_err_v2_hw(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba,
struct sas_task *task,
- struct hisi_sas_slot *slot)
+ struct hisi_sas_slot *slot,
+ int *abort_slot)
{
struct task_status_struct *ts = &task->task_status;
struct hisi_sas_err_record_v2 *err_record = slot->status_buffer;
@@ -1299,6 +1300,13 @@ static void slot_err_v2_hw(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba,
ts->stat = SAS_DATA_UNDERRUN;
break;
}
+ case TRANS_TX_ERR_FRAME_TXED:
+ {
+ /* This will request a retry */
+ ts->stat = SAS_QUEUE_FULL;
+ ++(*abort_slot);
+ break;
+ }
case TRANS_TX_OPEN_FAIL_WITH_IT_NEXUS_LOSS:
case TRANS_TX_ERR_PHY_NOT_ENABLE:
case TRANS_TX_OPEN_CNX_ERR_BY_OTHER:
@@ -1491,11 +1499,17 @@ slot_complete_v2_hw(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba, struct hisi_sas_slot *slot,
if ((complete_hdr->dw0 & CMPLT_HDR_ERX_MSK) &&
(!(complete_hdr->dw0 & CMPLT_HDR_RSPNS_XFRD_MSK))) {
+ int abort_slot = 0;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s slot %d has error info 0x%x\n",
__func__, slot->cmplt_queue_slot,
complete_hdr->dw0 & CMPLT_HDR_ERX_MSK);
- slot_err_v2_hw(hisi_hba, task, slot);
+ slot_err_v2_hw(hisi_hba, task, slot, &abort_slot);
+ if (unlikely(abort_slot)) {
+ queue_work(hisi_hba->wq, &slot->abort_slot);
+ sts = ts->stat;
+ goto out_1;
+ }
goto out;
}
Again this weird 'abort_slot' pointer reshuffling.
Care to clarify?
Cheers,
Hannes
Hopefully my explanation for patch #3 will help clarify here, as the
code is functionally the same.
Thanks,
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html