Re: [PATCH] Separate target visibility from reaped state information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:11:29PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> I am concerned about queuing something as a stable fix if it is just
> masking a fundamental underlying problem.

It's not masking a fundamental problem.  It fixes the target
state so that we can mark a starget as being under deletion
before we have to drop the list protecting the target list
iteration.  Independ of any any other scanning changes it is the
right thing to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux